Gravity Falls Wiki
Advertisement
Gravity Falls Wiki
S1e8 mabel giggle Content posted on this page is to only be about improving the article itself.

For all other types of discussion, please post them in the forums.
This includes (but not limited to) theories, discussion about how great someone is, fanon stories, etc. You have been warned.
Please remember to sign your comments with ~~~~ (four tildes).

"video game"

Is it worth changing "video game" to "visual novel"? There's a difference between the two, and the latter definitely fits this profile more.

StillAlive (talk) 01:12, September 26, 2014 (UTC)

I don't think it's worth the effort to change. Romance Academy 7 may be a text-based game, but it seems to have more game and less in-depth story. So, no, we should probably just keep it as video game. I mean, it doesn't make much of difference anyways, as long as you're interacting with buttons and characters on a screen and making things happen, I think that considering it a video game makes sense. In my eyes, visual novels are just a genre of video games anyways.
LameCube (talk) 01:32, September 26, 2014 (UTC)

True. Now that I've re-watched it, it seems more akin to a Dating Sim, anyway.

StillAlive (talk) 13:06, September 26, 2014 (UTC)

Wendy

Was Wendy embarrassed to say that she likes Soos, or does she not like to date Soos? I can't tell. Is it confirmed? BlayAndHowlie (talk) 22:23, October 16, 2014 (UTC)

Doesn't want to say she's wouldn't date him to his face. Evergreen-Tree.pngEvergreenFir Evergreen-Tree.png 03:05, October 17, 2014 (UTC)

The Japanese Text on the Box

Shouldn't there be a translation for the Japanese text on the back of Giffany's box? Or is it unnecessary since it only seems to say "9/10 Romance Academy" in Japanese?EchoOfNoise (talk) 22:23, November 3, 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, that's all it says. Seems like it's unnecessary imho. Evergreen-Tree.pngEvergreenFir Evergreen-Tree.png 04:00, November 4, 2014 (UTC)

Chalkboard Hamiltonian

Can we talk about the Hamiltonian on the chalkboard? The current article says that it is for a particle in a box when it is in fact a general non-relativisitic Hamiltonian that includes a position-dependent potential energy term. But the comparison between a particle in a box and Giffiny is kind of cute. Maybe changing it to "such as for a single particle in a box" would keep the best of both worlds.


Aren't the amanamtronic are an allusion to Five Nights at Freddy's? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alto Viola (wallcontribs)

I doubt it, as most episodes of every cartoon ever are written, drawn, and ready for broadcast far before the actual date. The fact that Five Nights at Freddy's came out around the same time was probably a coincidence. Ylimegirl (talk) 16:43, November 26, 2014 (UTC)
Advertisement