Content posted on this page is to only be about improving the article itself.
For all other types of discussion, please post them in the forums. This includes (but not limited to) theories, discussion about how great someone is, fanon stories, etc. You have been warned. Please remember to sign your comments with ~~~~ (four tildes).
Me is dipper wrote: Btw my LinkWiseLinkWise (talk) is fine because i will put my profile pic bye it
Is that okay?
This isn't just aimed at you, but also for future voters, please refrain from commenting things that are not votes. If you want to know if your current sig would pass with the new proposal please go to Thread:80682.
Support —I love the rules except for the image size things. Do you think that it is too small?
Image size was discussed in the previous thread. We compromised by upping it from 35 to 40 px. If they get too big, they start destroying sentence formatting is the main concern. If you can't agree to the 40 px, you are welcome to change your vote.
Support — everything except the gifs
I think gifs with more frames should be allowed, just they shouldn't be huge like Ruz's was.
Gifs were also discussed in the previous thread. We compromised that some minor gifs like in Bill's signature where it's just a couple frames is okay, but obnoxious ones wouldn't be. If you are really against this rule, you are welcome to change your vote.
For note, you are always welcome to change your vote. Best to strikeout your old vote and revote. This proposal does reflect the past discussion and compromises. If you feel you cannot abide a certain aspect of the proposal, please don't hesitate to oppose it and specify that issue as the reason.
The "UTC" goes into the next line. Does that mean it's too long, or does the time stamp not count?
No that's fine. The message wall and forum widths are small and it depends how long the sentence is before your signature. Thinking more of length in terms of if your signature takes up a whole line on an article talk page, then that's long.